I like the "Guerilla" idea. I think I'll call the concept guerilla philanthropy. I could make a link list. Do you really think that's something people will appreciate?
I'd love to include some images and whatnot, but the problem is that I need to keep bandwidth use to a relative minimum. I'd far rather give the money to the people it's for then to a hosting company for more transfer.
The tone seemed confrontational in a couple of places, rather than professional. These lines in the FAQ specifically: This is all assuming you people like the idea enough to donate. So it’s ugly? So what? You got a problem with that?
The ugly web page thing was really just there for cheap laughs. I suppose I can make it even more obvious. "So it's ugly? So what? You got a problem with that? You talkin' to me? You must be talkin' to me..." and so on.
I'll take a look at the other and reword it. This is why people need editors. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-24 01:59 pm (UTC)$20 into the pot!
no subject
Date: 2006-03-24 03:30 pm (UTC)How's the site look?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-24 04:13 pm (UTC)It would be nice to have some imagery tho, perhaps a link list to other causes that you personally support, or related "guerilla giving".
no subject
Date: 2006-03-25 01:28 am (UTC)I'd love to include some images and whatnot, but the problem is that I need to keep bandwidth use to a relative minimum. I'd far rather give the money to the people it's for then to a hosting company for more transfer.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-24 07:15 pm (UTC)Any support for anonymous donations?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-25 01:30 am (UTC)Thanks for the input. Content-wise, how do you feel about it? Do you think the tone is right?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-25 03:30 pm (UTC)This is all assuming you people like the idea enough to donate.
So it’s ugly? So what? You got a problem with that?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-25 04:05 pm (UTC)I'll take a look at the other and reword it. This is why people need editors. :)